If Verichip can't profit off of the destruction of
our 4th amendment rights through REAL ID or the PASS ACT
they'll try through the H1N1 fraud.
VeriChip shares jump after H1N1 patent license win
Showing posts with label RFID CHIP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RFID CHIP. Show all posts
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Friday, July 17, 2009
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
REAL ID mandate resisted in Virginia
Washington Times
"Two pieces of legislation for consideration when lawmakers return to Richmond on Jan. 14 call for Virginia to ignore the federal mandate to come into compliance with the Real ID Act by the end of 2009.
Washington Times
"Two pieces of legislation for consideration when lawmakers return to Richmond on Jan. 14 call for Virginia to ignore the federal mandate to come into compliance with the Real ID Act by the end of 2009.
Similar bills went nowhere last year, but supporters say the looming deadline gives the issue new urgency."
Monday, September 22, 2008
REAL ID cards with RFID microchip tracking devices are being issued in New York
NY Issues Its REAL ID CardZDNet
Leave comments to this post if you wish to get involved in the Defeat REAL ID in NY Citizen Lobby Campaign
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
FACTS ABOUT REAL ID STRAIGHT FROM OPEN GOVERNMENT SOURCES
- Minimum Document Requirements - To meet the requirements of this section, a State shall include, at a minimum, the following information and features on each driver's license and identification card issued to a person by the State:
(1) The person's full legal name.
(2) The person's date of birth.
(3) The person's gender.
(4) The person's driver's license or identification card number.
(5) A digital photograph of the person. [Biometrics]
(6) The person's address of principle residence.
(7) The person's signature.
(8) Physical security features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or duplication of the document for fraudulent purposes.
(9) A common machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements. [RFID microchip]
-Source: REAL ID Act, sec.202b
*“Computer and security experts around the globe have repeatedly gone on record stating that creating a single REAL ID standard will lead to even more rampant identity and asset theft.” - Source: flyer published by Rep. Sam Rohrer, District 128, Pennsylvania House of Representatives
-“Database connectivity: States would be required to provide electronic access to specific information contained in the motor vehicle database of the State to all other States.” – Source: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) draft regulations for REAL ID
*DHS can also “legally” access from this database information through the “Drivers Privacy Protection Act” (DPPA).
*“Centralizing personal data on one single REAL ID card guarantees convenient ‘one-stop shopping’ for any technologically-savvy identity thieves.” - Source: flyer published by Rep. Sam Rohrer, District 128, Pennsylvania House of Representatives
-“Requirments for identification cards: Digital Photograph: Section 202(b)(5) of the Act requires that the State-issued REAL ID license or identification card include a digital photograph of the person.” - Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
*Linking databases with digital photos = facial recognition database.
*Electronic facial recognition = biometrics.
“Biometric authentication is the identification science of using physiological or behavioral characteristic of an individual (such as fingerprints, facial geometry, iris, blood vessel pattern in the retina, voice, signature, etc.) to attempt a confirmation of the identity for that individual ‘automatically’ with a high degree of certainty.” – Source: American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) press release “Current and Ongoing Efforts – Biometrics”
“Information sharing is appropriate around the world, and DHS plans to create a ‘Global Security Envelope’ of internationally shared biometric data that would permanently link individuals with biometric ID, personal information held by governments and corporations.” –Source: Robert Mocny, DHS
-“Comments: DHS invites comments on how States would or could incorporate a [Radio Frequency Identity Chips] RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology in addition to the REAL ID barcode requirement.” - Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
“[The REAL ID Act] could include Radio Frequency Identity Chips (RFID) which already been incorporated into our United States Passports. These chips would allow a citizen to be tracked from a distance without his, or her, knowledge.” - Source: flyer published by Rep. Sam Rohrer, District 128, Pennsylvania House of Representatives
-‘Official purpose’ of REAL ID:
“Definition of ‘official purpose’: Section 201(3) of the Act provides that the term ‘official purpose’ includes but is not limited to accessing Federal facilities, boarding Federally-regulated commercial aircraft, entering nuclear power plants, and other purposes that the Secretary [of Homeland Security] shall determine.’
DHS, under the discretionary authority granted to the Secretary of Homeland Security under the Act, may expand this definition in the future.” - Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
-Estimated cost to states: $14.6 billion
-Estimated cost to individuals: Nearly $8 billion
- Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
*DHS estimated total cost to the American taxpayer = $23.1 billion
Join us:
DEFEAT REAL ID in New York
DEFEAT REAL ID in Pennsylvania
(1) The person's full legal name.
(2) The person's date of birth.
(3) The person's gender.
(4) The person's driver's license or identification card number.
(5) A digital photograph of the person. [Biometrics]
(6) The person's address of principle residence.
(7) The person's signature.
(8) Physical security features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or duplication of the document for fraudulent purposes.
(9) A common machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements. [RFID microchip]
-Source: REAL ID Act, sec.202b
*“Computer and security experts around the globe have repeatedly gone on record stating that creating a single REAL ID standard will lead to even more rampant identity and asset theft.” - Source: flyer published by Rep. Sam Rohrer, District 128, Pennsylvania House of Representatives
-“Database connectivity: States would be required to provide electronic access to specific information contained in the motor vehicle database of the State to all other States.” – Source: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) draft regulations for REAL ID
*DHS can also “legally” access from this database information through the “Drivers Privacy Protection Act” (DPPA).
*“Centralizing personal data on one single REAL ID card guarantees convenient ‘one-stop shopping’ for any technologically-savvy identity thieves.” - Source: flyer published by Rep. Sam Rohrer, District 128, Pennsylvania House of Representatives
-“Requirments for identification cards: Digital Photograph: Section 202(b)(5) of the Act requires that the State-issued REAL ID license or identification card include a digital photograph of the person.” - Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
*Linking databases with digital photos = facial recognition database.
*Electronic facial recognition = biometrics.
“Biometric authentication is the identification science of using physiological or behavioral characteristic of an individual (such as fingerprints, facial geometry, iris, blood vessel pattern in the retina, voice, signature, etc.) to attempt a confirmation of the identity for that individual ‘automatically’ with a high degree of certainty.” – Source: American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) press release “Current and Ongoing Efforts – Biometrics”
“Information sharing is appropriate around the world, and DHS plans to create a ‘Global Security Envelope’ of internationally shared biometric data that would permanently link individuals with biometric ID, personal information held by governments and corporations.” –Source: Robert Mocny, DHS
-“Comments: DHS invites comments on how States would or could incorporate a [Radio Frequency Identity Chips] RFID-enabled vicinity chip technology in addition to the REAL ID barcode requirement.” - Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
“[The REAL ID Act] could include Radio Frequency Identity Chips (RFID) which already been incorporated into our United States Passports. These chips would allow a citizen to be tracked from a distance without his, or her, knowledge.” - Source: flyer published by Rep. Sam Rohrer, District 128, Pennsylvania House of Representatives
-‘Official purpose’ of REAL ID:
“Definition of ‘official purpose’: Section 201(3) of the Act provides that the term ‘official purpose’ includes but is not limited to accessing Federal facilities, boarding Federally-regulated commercial aircraft, entering nuclear power plants, and other purposes that the Secretary [of Homeland Security] shall determine.’
DHS, under the discretionary authority granted to the Secretary of Homeland Security under the Act, may expand this definition in the future.” - Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
-Estimated cost to states: $14.6 billion
-Estimated cost to individuals: Nearly $8 billion
- Source: DHS draft regulations for REAL ID
*DHS estimated total cost to the American taxpayer = $23.1 billion
Join us:
DEFEAT REAL ID in New York
DEFEAT REAL ID in Pennsylvania
Friday, August 31, 2007
Senate blocks mandatory ID implants in employees
The bill would prevent employers in the state from requiring workers to have the devices.
By Patrick McGreevy
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 31, 2007
Tackling a dilemma right out of a science fiction novel, the state Senate passed legislation Thursday that would bar employers from requiring workers to have identification devices implanted under their skin.
State Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto) proposed the measure after at least one company began marketing radio frequency identification devices for use in humans.
The devices, as small as a grain of rice, can be used by employers to identify workers. A scanner passing over a body part implanted with one can instantly identify the person.
"RFID is a minor miracle, with all sorts of good uses," Simitian said. "But we shouldn't condone forced 'tagging' of humans. It's the ultimate invasion of privacy."
Simitian said he fears that the devices could be compromised by persons with unauthorized scanners, facilitating identity theft and improper tracking and surveillance.
The bill has been approved by the state Assembly and now goes to the governor.
Nine senators opposed the measure, including Bob Margett (R-Arcadia), who said it is premature to legislate technology that has not yet proved to be a problem. "It sounded like it was a solution looking for a problem," Margett said. "It didn't seem like it was necessary."
One company, VeriChip, has been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration to sell implanted identification devices, and about 2,000 people have had them implanted, Simitian said. A representative of the firm did not return calls seeking comment Thursday.
CityWatcher.com, a Cincinnati video surveillance company, has required employees who work in its secure data center to have a microchip implanted in an arm.
Similar technology has been used for years to help identify lost pets.
Meanwhile, the Assembly approved a bill that would allow Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca and other law enforcement officials to put thousands of inmates on detention in their homes, with electronic monitoring equipment attached to their ankles.
Baca sought the legislation to help relieve overcrowding in L.A. County jails and said he would assign about 2,000 inmates with low-level offenses to involuntary home detention if the governor signs the bill. Currently, inmates must volunteer for home detention. The Senate has passed the bill.
thanks to Crimes and Corruption of the New World Order News for article
By Patrick McGreevy
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 31, 2007
Tackling a dilemma right out of a science fiction novel, the state Senate passed legislation Thursday that would bar employers from requiring workers to have identification devices implanted under their skin.
State Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto) proposed the measure after at least one company began marketing radio frequency identification devices for use in humans.
The devices, as small as a grain of rice, can be used by employers to identify workers. A scanner passing over a body part implanted with one can instantly identify the person.
"RFID is a minor miracle, with all sorts of good uses," Simitian said. "But we shouldn't condone forced 'tagging' of humans. It's the ultimate invasion of privacy."
Simitian said he fears that the devices could be compromised by persons with unauthorized scanners, facilitating identity theft and improper tracking and surveillance.
The bill has been approved by the state Assembly and now goes to the governor.
Nine senators opposed the measure, including Bob Margett (R-Arcadia), who said it is premature to legislate technology that has not yet proved to be a problem. "It sounded like it was a solution looking for a problem," Margett said. "It didn't seem like it was necessary."
One company, VeriChip, has been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration to sell implanted identification devices, and about 2,000 people have had them implanted, Simitian said. A representative of the firm did not return calls seeking comment Thursday.
CityWatcher.com, a Cincinnati video surveillance company, has required employees who work in its secure data center to have a microchip implanted in an arm.
Similar technology has been used for years to help identify lost pets.
Meanwhile, the Assembly approved a bill that would allow Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca and other law enforcement officials to put thousands of inmates on detention in their homes, with electronic monitoring equipment attached to their ankles.
Baca sought the legislation to help relieve overcrowding in L.A. County jails and said he would assign about 2,000 inmates with low-level offenses to involuntary home detention if the governor signs the bill. Currently, inmates must volunteer for home detention. The Senate has passed the bill.
thanks to Crimes and Corruption of the New World Order News for article
Friday, June 1, 2007
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
the government will have you all microchipped by May 11, 2008
corporate/government media blackout on one of the most significant and repressive laws of this country's history -
REAL ID ACT -- HR418
do you want to be microchipped so the government can track your every move and store all private information about you in a secret database?
then don't accept this law which calls for all citizens to have a national ID card embedded with an RFID chip.
this is how bad it is .....
"At least 33 states are pushing for laws or resolutions blocking the program, the Senate recently held hearings on its implications for civil liberties, and the Department of Homeland Security's own privacy department gave the initiative the thumbs-down."
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/05/real_id_revolt.html
go here
http://www.outsourcecongress.org/
to get e-mail of your representatives
staffers - it'll get to them quicker this way.
tell them you oppose this unconstitutional law.
sample:
Dear Senator Lautenberg,
I firmly oppose bill HR418
or the REAL ID ACT which
was recently signed into
law.
This law violates the 4th
amendment of the constitution
and is a violation of state's
rights.
i demand that you immediately
make moves to repeal this
law and stand up for your
constituents.
Thank you,
REAL ID ACT -- HR418
do you want to be microchipped so the government can track your every move and store all private information about you in a secret database?
then don't accept this law which calls for all citizens to have a national ID card embedded with an RFID chip.
this is how bad it is .....
"At least 33 states are pushing for laws or resolutions blocking the program, the Senate recently held hearings on its implications for civil liberties, and the Department of Homeland Security's own privacy department gave the initiative the thumbs-down."
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/05/real_id_revolt.html
go here
http://www.outsourcecongress.org/
to get e-mail of your representatives
staffers - it'll get to them quicker this way.
tell them you oppose this unconstitutional law.
sample:
Dear Senator Lautenberg,
I firmly oppose bill HR418
or the REAL ID ACT which
was recently signed into
law.
This law violates the 4th
amendment of the constitution
and is a violation of state's
rights.
i demand that you immediately
make moves to repeal this
law and stand up for your
constituents.
Thank you,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)